ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Clinical studies demonstrate that up to 40% of patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), thus, appropriate patient selection is critical to the success of CRT in heart failure. Objective: Evaluation of mortality predictors and response to CRT in the Brazilian scenario. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients submitted to CRT in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil from 2008 to 2014. Survival was assessed through a database of the State Department of Health (RS). Predictors of echocardiographic response were evaluated using Poisson regression. Survival analysis was performed by Cox regression and Kaplan Meyer curves. A two-tailed p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 170 patients with an average follow-up of 1011 ± 632 days were included. The total mortality was 30%. The independent predictors of mortality were age (hazard ratio [HR] of 1.05, p = 0.027), previous acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (HR of 2.17, p = 0.049) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR of 3.13, p = 0.015). The percentage of biventricular stimulation at 6 months was identified as protective factor of mortality ([HR] 0.97, p = 0.048). The independent predictors associated with the echocardiographic response were absence of mitral insufficiency, presence of left bundle branch block and percentage of biventricular stimulation. Conclusion: Mortality in patients submitted to CRT in a tertiary hospital was independently associated with age, presence of COPD and previous AMI. The percentage of biventricular pacing evaluated 6 months after resynchronizer implantation was independently associated with improved survival and echocardiographic response.
Resumo Fundamento: Estudos Clínicos demonstram que até 40% dos pacientes não respondem à terapia de ressincronização cardíaca (TRC), assim a seleção apropriada dos pacientes é fundamental para o sucesso da TRC na insuficiência cardíaca. Objetivo: Avaliação de preditores de mortalidade e resposta à TRC no cenário brasileiro. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo incluindo os pacientes submetidos à TRC em hospital terciário no Sul do Brasil entre 2008-2014. A sobrevida foi avaliada através de banco de dados da Secretaria Estadual de Saúde (RS). Os preditores de resposta ecocardiográfica foram avaliados utilizando método de regressão de Poisson. A análise de sobrevida foi feita por regressão de Cox e curvas de Kaplan Meyer. Um valor de p bicaudal inferior a 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados: Foram incluídos 170 pacientes com seguimento médio de 1011 ± 632 dias. A mortalidade total foi de 30%. Os preditores independentes de mortalidade identificados foram idade (hazzard ratio [HR] de 1,05; p = 0,027), infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) prévio (HR de 2,17; p = 0,049) e doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) (HR de 3,13; p = 0,015). O percentual de estimulação biventricular em 6 meses foi identificado com fator protetor de mortalidade ([HR] 0,97; p = 0,048). Os preditores independentes associados à reposta ecocardiográfica foram ausência de insuficiência mitral, presença de bloqueio de ramo esquerdo e percentual de estimulação biventricular. Conclusão: A mortalidade nos pacientes submetidos à TRC em hospital terciário foi independentemente associada à idade, presença de DPOC e IAM prévio. O percentual de estimulação biventricular avaliado 6 meses após o implante do ressincronizador foi independentemente associado a melhora da sobrevida e resposta ecocardiográfica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Bundle-Branch Block/surgery , Bundle-Branch Block/mortality , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Echocardiography , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hospitals , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/physiopathology , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Background: Multiple randomized trials support the clinical benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and ventricular dyssynchrony. Since the year 2000 this therapy has been increasingly used in Chile. Aim: To describe the clinical characteristics and follow-up of HF patients undergoing CRT in a single Chilean university hospital during the last 10 years. Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing CRT between 2000 and 2010 in our university hospital were included. Clinical and echocardiographic data were extracted from medical records and mortality causes were obtained from the National Identification Service. Results: A total of 252 patients underwent CRT during the study period. Seventy five percent were in New York Heart Associatin (NYHA) functional class III and mean ejection fraction was 29 ± 10%. Complete left bundle branch block was present in 55% and 20% had permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Mean survival was 86% at 1 year and 82% of patients in NYHA class III-IV improved at least one functional class. Survival was poorer in patients with ischemic etiology (hazard ratio (HR) 1.48), functional class IV (HR 2.2), right bundle branch block (RBBB) (HR 3.1) and AF (HR 3.4). No survival differences were observed between patients with and without an implanted cardiodefibrillator. Conclusions: This series show good clinical outcomes, comparable to those reported in randomized trials. Predictors of worse survival included an ischemic etiology, functional class IV, RBBB and AF. Patients with a defibrillator had no better survival, which could be relevant in countries with limited health care resources.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/mortality , Heart Failure/mortality , Bundle-Branch Block/mortality , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Chile , Electrocardiography , Heart Failure/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
FUNDAMENTO: A literatura carece de estudos a respeito do valor prognóstico da ecocardiografia sob estresse pelo esforço físico (EF) em pacientes portadores de bloqueio completo do ramo esquerdo do feixe de His (BRE). OBJETIVO: Avaliar o valor prognóstico da EF em portadores de BRE. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de coorte retrospectiva, em que foram avaliados 135 pacientes portadores de BRE, no período entre janeiro de 2001 e outubro de 2009, dos quais 37,8 por cento eram homens, com média de idade de 63,6 ± 11,5 anos, submetidos à EF segundo o protocolo de Bruce em esteira ergométrica. Foi utilizada a regressão de Cox, considerando-se estes desfechos: óbito por todas as causas e por eventos cardíacos, definidos como infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM), angioplastia percutânea (AP), revascularização miocárdica (RM) e óbito por causas cardíacas. RESULTADOS: A EF positiva foi encontrada em 42 pacientes (31 por cento). O tempo de seguimento médio foi de 45,8 ± 4,7 meses. Nesse período, houve nove óbitos por todas as causas e nove eventos cardíacos (três óbitos por causa cardíaca, três IAM, duas AP e uma RM). A taxa de mortalidade por todas as causas em cinco anos foi de 16,1 por cento no grupo com exame positivo e de 2,5 por cento no grupo com exame negativo (p = 0,171), enquanto a taxa de eventos cardíacos no mesmo período foi de 15,1 por cento no grupo com exame positivo e de 1,6 por cento no grupo com exame negativo (p = 0,009). CONCLUSÃO: A EF mostrou-se preditora de eventos cardíacos em pacientes portadores de BRE.
BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies about the prognostic value of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in patients with complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) of the bundle of His. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of ESE in patients with LBBB. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort that evaluated 135 patients with LBBB, from January 2001 to October 2009, of which 37.8 percent were men, mean age 63.6 ± 11.5 years submitted to ESE according to Bruce protocol on a treadmill. Cox regression was used, considering these outcomes: death from all causes and from cardiac events, defined as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), percutaneous angioplasty (PA), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and death from cardiac causes. RESULTS: Positive ESE was observed in 42 patients (31 percent). The mean follow-up was 45.8 ± 4.7 months. During this period, there were 9 deaths from all causes and 9 cardiac events (3 deaths from cardiac causes, 3 myocardial infarctions, 2 PA and one CABG). The mortality rate from all causes during five years was 16.1 percent in the group with positive ESE and 2.5 percent in the group with negative test (p = 0.171), whereas the rate of cardiac events in the same period was 15.1 percent for the positive ESE and 1.6 percent in the group with negative test (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: ESE showed to be a predictor of cardiac events in patients with LBBB.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Bundle-Branch Block/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Echocardiography, Stress/methods , Cause of Death , Epidemiologic Methods , PrognosisABSTRACT
Objective: Compare in-hospital outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with right versus left bundle branch block. Methods: RENASICA II, a national mexican registry enrolled 8098 patients with final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome secondary to ischemic heart disease. In 4555 STEMI patients, 545 had bundle branch block, 318 (58.3%) with right and 225 patients with left (41.6%). Both groups were compared in terms of in-hospital outcome through major cardiovascular adverse events; (cardiovascular death, recurrent ischemia and reinfarction). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify in-hospital mortality risk among right and left bundle branch block patients. Results: There were not statistical differences in both groups regarding baseline characteristics, time of ischemia, myocardial infarction location, ventricular dysfunction and reperfusion strategies. In-hospital outcome in bundle branch block group was characterized by a high incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events with a trend to higher mortality in patients with right bundle branch block (OR 1.70, CI 1.19 - 2.42, p < 0.003), compared to left bundle branch block patients. Conclusion: In this sub-study right bundle branch block accompanying ST-elevation myocardial infarction of any location at emergency room presentation was an independent predictor of high in-hospital mortality.
Objetivo: Comparar la evolución hospitalaria en pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio con bloqueo de rama derecha versus bloqueo de rama izquierda. Método: El Registro Nacional de Síndromes Coronarios Agudos II, incluyó 8098 pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo, de los cuales 4555 corresponden a infarto con elevación del segmento ST. De ellos, se demostró en 545 bloqueo de rama: 318 (58.3%) tuvieron bloqueo de rama derecha y 227 (41.6%) bloqueo de rama izquierda. Fueron comparados en términos de mortalidad hospitalaria y eventos cardiovasculares mayores adversos. Se realizó un análisis multivariado para identificar mortalidad hospitalaria a través de eventos mayores entre pacientes con ambos bloqueos de rama. Resultados: No hubo deferencia estadísticamente significativa en ambos grupos en relación con características basales, tiempo de isquemia, localización del infarto, disfunción ventricular o estrategia de reperfusión utilizada. Los pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio de cualquier localización y bloqueo de rama derecha tuvieron mayor tendencia para mortalidad hospitalaria y eventos cardiovasculares mayores (OR 1.70, IC 1.19-2.42, p < 0.003) vs. pacientes con bloqueo de rama izquierda. Conclusión: En el infarto agudo del miocardio con elevación del segmento ST, el bloqueo de rama derecha fue un predictor independiente de alta mortalidad hospitalaria.
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Bundle-Branch Block/complications , Bundle-Branch Block/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Mexico , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , RegistriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of intraventricular and atrioventricular conduction defects associated with acute myocardial infarction and the degree of in hospital mortality resulting from this condition during the era of thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: Observational study of a cohort of 929 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression. Was used. RESULTS: Logistic regression showed a greater incidence of bundle branch block in male sex (odds ratio = 1.87, 95 per cent CI = 1.02-3.42), age over 70 years (odds ratio = 2.31, 95 per cent CI = 1.68-5.00), anterior localization of the infarction (odds ratio = 1.93, 95 per cent CI = 1.03-3.65). There was a greater incidence of complete atrioventricular block in inferior infarcts (odds ratio = 2.59, 95 per cent CI 1.30-5.18) and the presence of cardiogenic shock (odds ratio = 3.90, 95 per cent CI = 1.43-10.65). Use of a thrombolytic agent was associated with a tendency toward a lower occurrence of bundle branch block (odds ratio = 0.68) and a greater occurrence of complete atrioventricular block (odds ratio = 1.44). The presence of bundle branch block (odds ratio = 2.45 95 per cent , CI = 1.14-5.28) and of complete atrioventricular block (odds ratio = 13.59, 95 per cent CI = 5.43-33.98) was associated with a high and independent probability of inhospital death. CONCLUSION: During the current era of thrombolytic therapy and in this population, intraventricular disturbances of electrical conduction and complete atrioventricular block were associated with a high and independent risk of inhospital death during acute myocardial infarction.